[1] A. Acar, T. Taura, E. Yamamoto, and N. Yusof. 

Object vs. relation: understanding the link between

culture and cognition with the help of wordnet. 

International Journal on Asian Language Processing,

21(9):199-208, 2011. [2] R. Bosker and T. Snijders. Multilevel analysis: An

introduction to basic and advanced multilevel 

modeling, 2nd ed. New York, 2012. [3] M. Cristani, A. Vinciarelli, C. Segalin, and A. Perina. 

Unveiling the multimedia unconscious: Implicit 

cognitive processes and multimedia content analysis.

In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international 

conference on Multimedia, pages 213-222. ACM, 2013. quantitative relationship between quality of experience and quality of service. Network, IEEE, 24(2):36-41, 2010. [5] X.-P. Gao, J. H. Xin, T. Sato, A. Hansuebsai, M. Scalzo, K. Kajiwara, S.-S. Guan, J. Valldeperas,

M. J. Lis, and M. Billger. Analysis of cross-cultural

color emotion. Color Research & Application,

32(3):223-229, 2007. [6] G. Ghinea and S. Y. Chen. The impact of cognitive

styles on perceptual distributed multimedia quality.

British Journal of Educational Technology,

34(4):393-406, 2003. [7] G. Ghinea and J. P. Thomas. Qos impact on user

perception and understanding of multimedia video clips. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 49-54. ACM, 1998. [8] L. R. Goldberg. An alternative” description of personality”: the big-five factor structure. Journal of

personality and social psychology, 59(6):1216, 1990. [9] E. Goldstein. Cultural effects on visual perception.

SAGE Publications, Inc., Encyclopedia of Perception,

2010. [10] E. Goldstein. Sensation and Perception. Cengage as Learning, 2013. [11] S. D. Gosling, P. J. Rentfrow, and W. B. Swann. A

very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in personality, 37(6):504-528,

2003. [12] V. Q. E. Group et al. Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective

models of video quality assessment, phase ii (fr tv2). ftp://ftp. its. bldrdoc. gov/dist/ituvidq/

Boulder VQEG jan 04/VQEG PhaseII FRTV Final Report SG9060E. doc, 2003, 2003. [13] V. Q. E. Group et al. Report on the validation of video quality models for high definition video content.

tech. re p., http://www. vqeg. org, 2010. [14] S. R. Gulliver and G. Ghinea. Defining user perception

of distributed multimedia quality. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 2(4):241-257, 2006. [15] S. C. Guntuku, S. Roy, and W. Lin. Personality modeling based image recommendation. In MultiMedia Modeling, pages 171-182. Springer, 2015. [16] S. C. Guntuku, M. J. Scott, H. Yang, G. Ghinea, and

W. Lin. The CP-QAE-I: A video dataset for exploring

the effect of personality and culture on perceived

quality and affect in multimedia. In QoMEX. IEEE, 2015. [17] J. Henrich, S. J. Heine, and A. Norenzayan. The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and brain

sciences, 33(2-3):61-83, 2010. [18] G. Hofstede. Dimensionalizing cultures: The hofstede

model in context. Online readings in psychology and

culture, 2(1):8, 2011. [19] G. Hofstede, G. J. Hofstede, M. Minkov, and

H. Vinken. Values survey module 2013. URL: http://www.geerthofstede.nl/vsm2013, 2013. [20] G. Hoftede, G. J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind: intercultural McGraw-Hill, 2010. [21] M. Hyder, N. Crespi, M. Haun, C. Hoene, et al. Are qoe requirements for multimedia services different for men and women? analysis of gender differences in forming qoe in virtual acoustic environments. In Emerging Trends and Applications in Information Communication Technologies, pages 200-209. Springer, 2012. [22] R. N. Landers and T. S. Behrend. An inconvenient truth: Arbitrary distinctions between organizational, mechanical turk, and other convenience samples. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, pages 1-38, in press. [23] M. Leszczuk, L. Janowski, and M. Barkowsky. Freely available large-scale video quality assessment database in full-hd resolution with h.264 coding. In IEEE Globecom 2013, volume -, pages pp.1-6, Atlanta, United States, Dec 2013. [24] Y. Luo and X. Tang. Photo and video quality evaluation: Focusing on the subject. In In Eur. Conf. Comp. Vis. (ECCV), pages 386-399, 2008. [25] B. Manav. Color-emotion associations and color preferences: A case study for residences. Color Research & Application, 32(2):144-150, 2007. [26] W. A. Mansilla, A. Perkis, and T. Ebrahimi. Implicit experiences as a determinant of perceptual quality and aesthetic appreciation. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 153-162. ACM, 2011. [27] G. Matthews, I. J. Deary, and M. C. Whiteman. Personality traits. Cambridge University Press, 2003. [28] Y. miyamoto. Culture and analytic versus holistic cognition: toward multilevel analyses of culture influences. Academic Press, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2013. [29] A. Moorthy, P. Obrador, and N. Oliver. Towards computational models of visual aesthetic appeal of consumer videos. In In Eur. Conf. Comp. Vis. (ECCV), pages 1-14, 2010. [30] R. Nisbett and Y. Miyamoto. The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10):467-473, Oct 2005. [31] P. Paudyal, F. Battisti, and M. Carli. A study on the effects of quality of service parameters on perceived video quality. In Procs. of 5th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing, EUVIP, 2014. 

C. Timmerer, S. Davis, I. Burnett, C. Ritz, and H. Hellwagner. Investigating the impact of sensory effects on the quality of experience and emotional

response in web videos. In QoMEX, pages 278-283. IEEE, 2012. [33] J. A. Redi, Y. Zhu, H. de Ridder, and I. Heynderickx.

How passive image viewers became active multimedia

users. In Visual Signal Quality Assessment, pages 31-72. Springer, 2015. ˜u [34] U. Reiter, K. BrunnstrA˝m, K. D. Moor, M.-C.

Larabi, M. Pereira, A. Pinheiro, J. You, and A. Zgank. Factors Influencing Quality of Experience.

Springer, Quality of Experience, 2014. [35] A. Schaefer, F. Nils, X. Sanchez, and P. Philippot.

Assessing the effectiveness of a large database of emotion-eliciting films: A new tool for emotion

researchers. Cognition and Emotion, 24(7):1153-1172,

2010. [36] K. Seshadrinathan, R. Soundararajan, A. C. Bovik, and L. K. Cormack. Study of subjective and objective

quality assessment of video. Image Processing, IEEE

transactions on, 19(6):1427-1441, 2010. [37] L. Setlock, P.-A. Quinones, and S. Fussell. Does

culture interact with media richness? the effect of audio vs video conferencing on chinese and american dyads. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2007. [38] E. Siahaan, J. Redi, and A. Hanjalic. Beauty is in the

scale of the beholder: Comparison of methodologies

for the subjective assessment of image aesthetic appeal. In QoMEX, pages 245-250, Sept 2014. [39] W. Song, D. Tjondronegoro, and M. Docherty. Saving bitrate vs. pleasing users: where is the break-even point in mobile video quality? In Proceedings of the

19th ACM international conference on Multimedia,

pages 403-412. ACM, 2011. [40] I. Wechsung, M. Schulz, K.-P. Engelbrecht,

J. Niemann, and S. M¨ller. All users are (not) o

equal-the influence of user characteristics on perceived quality, modality choice and performance. In

Proceedings of the Paralinguistic Information and its

Integration in Spoken Dialogue Systems Workshop, pages 175-186. Springer, 2011. [41] Y. Zhu, I. Heynderickx, A. Hanjalic, and J. A. Redi. Towards a comprehensive model for predicting the

quality of individual visual experience. In IS&T/SPIE

Electronic Imaging, pages 93940A-93940A.

International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2015.