Typologies and Features of Play in Mobile Games for Mental Wellbeing

Ray, Emma, Ma, Eunice ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7451-546X, Krzywinska, Tanya ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0744-4144, Pavarini, Gabriela, Hugh-Jones, Siobhan, Mankee-Williams, Anna ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0829-8441, Belinskiy, Anton and Bhui, Kamaldeep (2023) Typologies and Features of Play in Mobile Games for Mental Wellbeing. Simulation and Gaming. ISSN 1046-8781

[thumbnail of MobileGames4MentalWellbeing_acceptedVersionaccessible.docx] Text
MobileGames4MentalWellbeing_acceptedVersionaccessible.docx - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (1MB)

Abstract / Summary

Background: The smartphone market is saturated with apps and games purporting to promote mental wellness. There has been a significant number of studies assessing the impact of these digital interventions.
Motivation. The majority of review papers solely focussed on the impact of strict rules and award systems of the apps. There is comparatively little attention paid to other game techniques designed to encourage creativity, a lusory attitude, and playful experiences.
Results. This gap is addressed in this paper in a consideration and analysis of a purposive selection of six mobile games marketed for wellbeing, our focus is on both external and internal motivations that these games offer. Our specific interest is how these games balance rule-based play with creativity. We find that ludic play is a highly-structured, rule-bound, goal-oriented play, in contrast to paedic play which a freeform, imaginative, and expressive. We argue that while ludic play is purposed towards the promotion of habit formation and generates feelings of accomplishment, it nonetheless relies heavily on extrinsic motivation to incentivise engagement. By contrast, paidic play, specifically role-playing, improvisation, and the imaginative co-creation of fictional game worlds, can be used effectively in these games to facilitate self-regulation, self-distancing, and therefore provides intrinsically-motivated engagement.
In the context of games for mental wellbeing, ludic play challenges players to complete therapeutic exercises, while paidic play offers a welcoming refuge from real world pressures and the opportunity to try on alternate selves.
Conclusion: Our intention is not to value paidic play over ludic play, but to consider how these two play modalities can complement and counterbalance each other to generate more effective engagement.

Item Type: Article
Identification Number: DOI: 10.1177/10468781231188392
ISSN: 1046-8781
eISSN: 1552-826X
Subjects: Computing & Data Science
Computing & Data Science > Game Design
Courses by Department: The Games Academy
Depositing User: Tanya Krzywinska
Date Deposited: 20 Jul 2023 13:29
Last Modified: 18 Nov 2024 14:24
URI: https://repository.falmouth.ac.uk/id/eprint/5028
View Item View Record (staff only)