Reliability in the Assessment of Program Quality by Teaching Assistants During Code Reviews

Scott, Michael and Ghinea, Gheorghita (2015) Reliability in the Assessment of Program Quality by Teaching Assistants During Code Reviews. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, July 6-8, 2015, Vilnius, Lithuania.

[img]
Preview
Text
sig-alternate-iticse15.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike.

Download (135kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2729094.2754844

Abstract / Summary

It is of paramount importance that formative feedback is meaningful in order to drive student learning. Achieving this, however, relies upon a clear and constructively aligned model of quality being applied consistently across submissions. This poster presentation raises concerns about the inter-rater reliability of code reviews conducted by teaching assistants in the absence of such a model. Five teaching assistants each reviewed 12 purposely selected programs submitted by introductory programming students. An analysis of their reliability revealed that while teaching assistants were self-consistent, they each assessed code quality in different ways. This suggests a need for standard models of program quality, alongside supporting rubrics and other tools, to be used during code reviews to improve the reliability of formative feedback.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Poster)
Subjects: Computer Science, Information & General Works
Education
Courses by Department: The School of Film & Television > Games and Animation
Depositing User: Michael Scott
Date Deposited: 06 Oct 2015 14:40
Last Modified: 06 Oct 2015 14:40
URI: http://repository.falmouth.ac.uk/id/eprint/1633

Actions

View Item View Item (login required)